Menu

Durham vs Glamorgan, Division 2, County Championship 2021 - Player PerformanceDUR vs GLAM, Division 2, County Championship 2021 - Player Performance

In This Match

ned-eckersley

Ned Eckersley

57

Open Profile
Runs57(73)
SR78.08
6s0
4s7
2s0
1s0
Dots0

90.4

W

N Eckersley c Nicholas Selman b Lukas Carey

Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, out Caught by Nicholas Selman!! N Eckersley c Nicholas Selman b Lukas Carey 57(73) [4s-7]

Ned Eckersley vs Bowlers

Bowler
B
R
D
4s
6s
SR
Michael Hogan
22
16
15
2
0
72.7
Andrew Salter
16
14
10
2
0
87.5
Lukas CareyW
15
13
8
1
0
86.7
Timm van der Gugten
14
11
10
2
0
78.6
David Lloyd
6
3
3
0
0
50.0
Ned Eckersley

In County Championship 2021

FC
Stats
Value
Matches
13
Innings
18
Runs
520
71
Balls
841
HS
113
64
Avg
30.59
93
SR
61.83
24
Not Out
1
Dots
573
Fours
60
78
Sixes
7
10
Fifties
3
47
Hundreds
1
36
Nineties
0
Ducks
2

Commentary

90.4W
Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, out Caught by Nicholas Selman!! N Eckersley c Nicholas Selman b Lukas Carey 57(73) [4s-7]
90.3
Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, 2 runs
88.6
Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, no run
88.5
Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, no run
87.64
Hogan to N Eckersley, FOUR
87.5
Hogan to N Eckersley, 2 runs
87.4
Hogan to N Eckersley, no run
87.3
Hogan to N Eckersley, no run
87.2
Hogan to N Eckersley, no run
87.1
Hogan to N Eckersley, no run
86.1
Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, 1 run
85.5
Hogan to N Eckersley, 1 run
85.1
Hogan to N Eckersley, 3 runs
84.6
Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, 1 run
84.2
Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, 1 run
84.1
Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, no run
83.3
Hogan to N Eckersley, 1 run
83.2
Hogan to N Eckersley, no run
83.1
Hogan to N Eckersley, no run
82.6
Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, 3 runs
82.5
Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, no run
82.44
Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, FOUR
82.3
Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, no run
81.6
Hogan to N Eckersley, no run
81.5
Hogan to N Eckersley, no run
80.6
Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, no run
80.2
Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, 1 run
80.1
Lukas Carey to N Eckersley, no run
79.6
Lloyd to N Eckersley, 1 run
79.5
Lloyd to N Eckersley, no run
79.4
Lloyd to N Eckersley, no run
78.6
Salter to N Eckersley, no run
78.5
Salter to N Eckersley, no run
78.2
Salter to N Eckersley, 1 run
78.1
Salter to N Eckersley, 2 runs
76.6
Salter to N Eckersley, no run
76.5
Salter to N Eckersley, 2 runs
76.4
Salter to N Eckersley, no run
76.3
Salter to N Eckersley, no run
76.2
Salter to N Eckersley, no run
76.1
Salter to N Eckersley, no run
75.1
Lloyd to N Eckersley, 1 run
74.6
Salter to N Eckersley, 1 run
74.5
Salter to N Eckersley, no run
74.44
Salter to N Eckersley, FOUR
74.3
Salter to N Eckersley, no run
74.2
Salter to N Eckersley, no run
74.14
Salter to N Eckersley, FOUR
72.6
van der Gugten to N Eckersley, no run
72.54
van der Gugten to N Eckersley, FOUR
72.4
van der Gugten to N Eckersley, no run
72.3
van der Gugten to N Eckersley, no run
72.2
van der Gugten to N Eckersley, no run
72.1
van der Gugten to N Eckersley, no run
71.5
Lloyd to N Eckersley, 1 run
71.4
Lloyd to N Eckersley, no run
70.6
van der Gugten to N Eckersley, no run
70.54
van der Gugten to N Eckersley, FOUR
70.4
van der Gugten to N Eckersley, 2 runs
70.3
van der Gugten to N Eckersley, no run
69.6
Hogan to N Eckersley, no run
69.54
Hogan to N Eckersley, FOUR
69.4
Hogan to N Eckersley, no run
69.3
Hogan to N Eckersley, no run
69.2
Hogan to N Eckersley, no run
69.1
Hogan to N Eckersley, no run
68.4
van der Gugten to N Eckersley, 1 run
68.3
van der Gugten to N Eckersley, no run
68.2
van der Gugten to N Eckersley, no run
68.1
van der Gugten to N Eckersley, no run
67.6
Hogan to N Eckersley, 1 run
67.5
Hogan to N Eckersley, no run
67.4
Hogan to N Eckersley, no run
">